Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libhugetlbfs - easy access to huge pages of memory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196057 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-23 10:12 EST ------- http://flooterbu.net/fedora/libhugetlbfs.spec http://flooterbu.net/fedora/libhugetlbfs-0.20060622-1.src.rpm I've updated the .spec to always look in /usr/lib for the ldscripts dir (just to reiterate, we were unable to find any distro that provides a /usr/lib64/ldscripts). Regarding the separation of 32bit and 64bit files, I believe that hugetlbd is intentionally always 32bits. I will ask Nish to confirm as he is the one who wrote that code. If that is the case, then what additional problems does this introduce for us? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
