Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail_Mime Alias: php-pear-Mail_Mime https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196824 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-27 21:03 EST ------- I have added the version dependencies for (post) and (postun), as well as modified the defattr. I have no problem changing the package name or owning the Mail/ directory, but have some questions first: I named this package using FE's guidelines for perl/cpan packages 'perl-CPANDIST' where CPANDIST is the name of the module in CPAN. I adopted this for pear to read 'php-pear-PEARDIST'. Since Mail_Mime is not a sub-package of Mail, using a '-' to delimit Mail and Mime seems misleading to me. Mail_Mime does not depend on Mail, but Mail-Mime looks like it might. I'd love to change it if you still feel the 'no underscore' rule precludes all other naming conventions, just putting in my 0.02 :) Also, and along the same lines, owning the Mail/ directory seems like a bad idea to me. Pear contains many Mail_xxx packages (http://pear.php.net/search.php?q=mail&in=packages&x=0&y=0), none of which depend on the Mail package, but (I assume) all of which place files in the Mail/ directory. It's hard to say which of these packages should own Mail/, but we also can't rely on Mail to own it, as one could easily have Mail_Mime installed without installing Mail. (For FE, we could force the Mail package to own Mail/ and then force Mail_xxx packages to require Mail even though they don't...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedoraemail@example.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review