Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: flasm - Flash bytecode assembler disassembler


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197487


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-03 14:39 EST -------
Good:
+ Tarballs is the same as the upstream.
+ Local build ok.
+ Mock build works fine to FC-5.
+ rpmlint doesn't complaints the source rpm.
+ rpmlint doesn't complaints the binary rpm.
+ license seem to be OSS compilant.
+ rpm contains verbatin copy of the license.
+ filelist in binary rpm ok.
+ program can start without crash.

ACCEPTED !!!

 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to