Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnustep-make - GNUstep makefile package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197649 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-08 08:42 EST ------- But the autotools packages are not BuildRequired on, gnustep-make is. The /usr/local/GNUstep folder should theoretically be part of a "filesystem" type category package, but that would be overkill. So, if you like, gnustep-make is also some kind of "filesystem-gnustep". And the argument on /usr/local would apply to "filesystem", not autotools (assuming all packages installing under /usr/local are autotooled, which is not true, but since we're in the apples/orange business anyway, let's pass this, too ;). I did get your point, I just don't know how to improve the situation short of dropping the package or making it fully FHS conformant, which (currently) means that it would become unmaintainable very soon. :/ I'll look into some more FHS vs GNUstep discussions, perhaps there is some nice compromise somehwere, and I'm certainly open to any suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review