Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor]


           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-12 06:48 EST -------
== Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
   Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull

* MUST Items:
     - MUST: rpmlint shows no error. 
     - MUST: dist tag is present.
     - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
     - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package eiciel, in the
format eiciel.spec.
      - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license 
      - MUST: This package includes License file COPYING.
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct 
      - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
      - MUST: This package  have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
      - MUST: This package used macros.
      - MUST: Document files are included like README.
      - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.
      * Source URL is present and working.
      * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:       
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
      * BuildRequires is correct

What you need to do:-
          I am not able to see Desktop file installed and can be executed from
          You need to add following lines
Requires(post): desktop-file-utils
Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils
update-desktop-database &> /dev/null ||:

update-desktop-database &> /dev/null ||:


Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to