Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-17 14:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This is an odd package; it's a Perl module, but it's really all documentation > except for the tiny viewer script. I'm inclined to just treat it as any other > perl module but it does seem a bit strange. It seemed to make sense to work on getting this in along with parrot and pugs for anyone who wanted to work on Perl 6. > More troubling is this: > > This Copyright applies only to the Perl6::Bible Perl software distribution, > not > the documents bundled within. > > and the documents within all seem to lack any kind of copyright information. I hadn't noticed that, but I'm sure that was just a clarification of the copyright on the package, not a statement about the license. Given that those documents are *the* formal specification and documentation for Perl 6, I'll be very surprised if they aren't covered by the usual GPL/Artistic dual license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
