Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-17 15:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Is the intention of %{_javadir}/gcj-endorsed that only gcj (not other JVMs) > should be using stuff from there? Other JVMs, eg. the Sun one, would have > problems with the jar because it's not signed. Yes, I'm not supporting non-GNU Classpath based JVMs with this RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
