Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: gutenprint


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-18 03:54 EST -------
(In reply to comment #12)
>   Will check perl thing in gutenprint package.I have already created package
> with Obsoletes and updates files are as
> SPEC file: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint.spec
> SRPM file:
> http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/gutenprint/gutenprint-5.0.0-0.2.rc3.fc5.src.rpm

You're still not using the package split suggested in the upstream README file.
Why not?

> If its not allowed to obsolete core packages then i can revert back changes in
> SPEC. Also why not to package 
> %{_libdir}/gimp/*/plug-ins/print
> under gutenprint?

I didn't include this file because you didn't include it in your original
package. The reason you didn't include it is probably because you missed the
buildreq of gimp-devel, so it didn't get built. I think it actually belongs in a
separate subpackage. See the README file again.

> Why mock build did not give any dependency error for both perl packages but
> while installing final binary rpm it asked for perl-PerlMenu as well as
> perl-Curses ?

mock will help you to find build-time dependencies (BuildRequires). It doesn't
help with runtime dependencies (Requires). The perl modules are only needed at
runtime, not build-time.

Did you find out where these dependencies are coming from?

(In reply to comment #13)
> But i solved dependency problem using perl-PerlMenu package and you have asked
> me to add perl(perlmenu) module package?
> What is correct package then?

I believe it's using this:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/perlmenu/

The upstream name for this is all lower case.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to