Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199941

           Summary: Review Request: gnome-python2-gda
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
         QAContact: [email protected]


Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gnome-python2-gda.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gnome-python2-gda-2.14.0-1.src.rpm

Description: pyGNOME Python extension module for interacting with gda

This module should be part of the gnome-python2-extras package, which is in 
Core. However since libgda (the Gnome database accesslib) is in Extras, the gda 
module is not enabled in Core. The goal of this package is to provide that 
missing gda module, which is needed by Glom.

I do think the better solution would be for the stable tree of libgda to be 
part of Fedora Core, but one has to choose one's battles.

You'll notice some devel-type files are present in the package, which rpmlint 
will complain about. The spec tries to be consistent with that of 
gnome-python2-extras in Core, and considering the small size of the package I 
don't think the devel split is worth the effort.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to