Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monsterz - Puzzle game, similar to Bejeweled or 
Zookeeper


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199611


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-25 15:59 EST -------
MUST items:
 * rpmlint output:
I: monsterz checking
W: monsterz invalid-license WTFPL
E: monsterz non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/monsterz 02755
I: monsterz-data checking
W: monsterz-data invalid-license WTFPL
W: monsterz-data no-documentation
I: monsterz-debuginfo checking
W: monsterz-debuginfo invalid-license WTFPL
 despite error, permissions of /usr/bin/monsterz are good
 * package is named good
 * spec file name is correct
 * package meets Packaging Guidelines
 * package is licensed with an open-source compatible license
 * License field in .spec file matches the actual license (WTFPL)
 * spec file is written in American English and is legible
 * md5sum of upstream source and provided in SRPM is matching
(323d04d4a2a2905df91eab4ff17e537d)
 * package succesfully compile on i386
 * dependencies are good
 * there are no locales
 * no need to /sbin/ldconfig
 * there is no duplicate files in %files
 * spec file hadnles macros properly
 * there is no need to -devel subpackage
 * package doesn't contatin any .la files
 * desktop file is created properly

And the package compiles successfully on mock.

> I think the possibility of corrupting the scoreboard file is extremely 
> small but that's just IMHO. :-)

IMHO, too ;)

Approved.
 



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to