Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: freeglut

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-25 23:46 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)

> 4.  Optional.  Be careful about the Obsoletes/Provides.  It seemingly 
> Obsoletes
> itself using:
> Obsoletes: glut <= 3.7
> Provides:  glut  = 3.7
> maybe use something safer like:
> Obsoletes: glut < 3.7-%{release}
> Provides:  glut = 3.7-%{release}
> (and likewise for the Ob/Pr for glut-devel)
> Or heck, drop the glut Obsoletes/Provides bits altogether, isn't glut pretty
> much ancient history anyway?  (:
Nope, glut isn't ancient history. freeglut is an alternative to/replacement for

Therefore packages using GLut often Requires: glut-devel, because they depend on
a package providing a Glut API and do not depend on freeglut/freeglut-devel.

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to