Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-26 18:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > What info is needed from me? No info is needed, but if I am not mistaken, NEEDINFO_REPORTER is set when waiting for something by the initial submitter, that's why I set it on that review (the aim is to help potential reviewers know what the status of the review is). > OK, maybe this info is needed: I will update the package complying with the > Fedora GNU GPL naming convention once Gwyddion 1.99.8 is released. > > I abandoned the idea to get Gwyddion to FE fast after the two+ months of no > reaction to the initial submission (of the old stable version). I will not > support any pre-2.0 version therefore I don't want them to actually appear in > FE. And the closer the thing your review is to the real thing the better for > the review. Thanks for the info. Anyway since at least one upstream release is required for things to move on, I think that setting the status to NEEDINFO_REPORTER is the right thing to do. But do it only if it seems relevant to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
