Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jokosher


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-27 11:39 EST -------
The more I look into this package, the more odd it becomes.

There is nothing (I can see) on the website as to the license
Upstream recommending a cvs snapshot (moving target problems)
Upstream not sticking totally to the GPL

Sure, it looks a nice package, but as it stands, is it stable (upstream) enough
to be in Extras?

The functionality issues in #11 give me serious reasons to doubt it's inclusion
at this time (though this could be down [again] to upstream or non-inclusion of
R's on the rpm itself)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to