Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-27 11:39 EST ------- The more I look into this package, the more odd it becomes. There is nothing (I can see) on the website as to the license Upstream recommending a cvs snapshot (moving target problems) Upstream not sticking totally to the GPL Sure, it looks a nice package, but as it stands, is it stable (upstream) enough to be in Extras? The functionality issues in #11 give me serious reasons to doubt it's inclusion at this time (though this could be down [again] to upstream or non-inclusion of R's on the rpm itself) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review