Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198885 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-27 20:09 EST ------- I did try via spectool to fetch the 0.76 source about ten times but never succeeded in hitting a mirror that had it. Now that this package is updated to 0.77 there are no worries. Anyway, this builds, installs and checks out fine. * source files match upstream: bca2c306d8c63535845b760883a13644 POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.77.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is redundant). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * noarch package; no debuginfo. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP) = 0.77 perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::Request) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::RequestFactory) = 0.01 perl(POE::Filter::HTTPChunk) perl(POE::Filter::HTTPHead) = 0.01 perl(POE::Filter::HTTPHead_Line) perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP = 0.77-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(POE) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::Request) perl(POE::Component::Client::HTTP::RequestFactory) perl(POE::Filter::Line) perl(base) perl(bytes) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=76, 5 wallclock secs ( 2.12 cusr + 0.66 csys = 2.78 CPU) * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
