Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-08-04 22:03 EST -------
(In reply to comment #44)
> > but
> > the fact is that zaptel is GPL, so is this really the right place to draw 
> > the
> > proverbial line in the sand?
> 
> Well, one kernel-developer is hightly respect thinks the line should be drawn
> even earlier -- see Bug 189400 comment 9

I would like to point out that the same person that made that comment actually
_uses_ this module even.

I consider myself a fairly practical person that isn't swayed by politics often.
 However, I agree with Thorsten for this particular module.  The reasoning from
upstream is simply ridiculous.  One of the 3rd party repos would be a better
candidate for this module.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to