Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: db4o


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201551





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-08-08 07:16 EST -------
Ok, upon further reading I see that you're right about %{_libdir}, though the
guidelines say it is a temporary solution.

However, you still haven't addressed my concerns about installing a precompiled
binary. In particular, /usr/lib/mono/gac/db4o/*/db4o.dll (installed) is binary
identical to db4o-5.5/dll/db4o.dll (shipped). The guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#head-1d3454f431ec1c8761eb46582e7f66bbddc1fd08
say explicitly that "All packages must build from source".

And I'd like you to name the docs package db4o-doc, not db4o-docs, as this
naming seems to be more common among extras packages.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to