Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: SS5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-10 11:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > - What I have to do when I'll release ss5-3.6.1 ? Have a look at the beginning of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/UsingCvsFaq > - I have some installation on RedHat AS4.0, can I make a branches for RH? There is no such thing in fedora. AS4.0 should be more or less compatible with fedora core 3 (and there is somewhere a repo with fedora extras packages rebuilt for centos4 which should be compatible with AS4), but inclusion of FC-3 branches isn't possible anymore as it is legacy since quite a long time. > - Can I expose Fedora logo on my web site to promote the package? I think the best information about the logo is to be found here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review