Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-10 16:54 EST ------- Well, A: %Requires(post) requires xorg-x11-font-utils, /usr/sbin/chkfontpath, fontconfig. Then, the check for existence of binary is already done by this, I think? B. The usage of "umask 133" was borrowed from fonts-japanese. This is because mkfontdir creates fonts.dir in the directory in which fonts are installed (in this case, /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc ). This is to ensure that fonts.dir should be 0644 permission. (There may be the case that a people like me install rpm as a normal user by sudo, whose umask has 0077. In this case, fonts.dir cannot be read by another normal user.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
