Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-14 10:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > > E: clement non-standard-gid /var/spool/clement-2.1/mqueue clement > > Who cares? This is not the first package that creates a new user/group. Me!. Agree this is not the first package creating a user/group.... problem, if rpmlint is THE reference and rpmlint is reporting error how can I make the difference between real error which are errors from simple advice... now in my case there is 48 "errors" which are 'who cares',.... hmmmm...... > > > My understanding of the last Michael comment is to let the sys-admin > > delete the remaining user/group himself, right? > > Yes. If package removal does not get rid of all files owned by that > user/group, the next package might allocate the same uid/gid and give > some other software access to the old files, which are still left > on the file-system as orphans. OK, lets keep the user/group then > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review