Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202384 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-14 10:57 EST ------- PUBLISH +1 Good: * tarball verified against svn * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Desktop entry is fine * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Scriptlets look good. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC5 * rpmlint is basically clean. The warning about the devel package not having docs can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
