Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp


           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
               Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) |

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-08-15 05:21 EST -------
I updated the spec and the srpms with new versions.

ldconfig is added.

We do use gacutils to install the dlls, but not in the strange way that the
packaging guidelines example show, its just called as a normal part of the
upstream makefiles. We do pass the GACUTIL_FLAGS to make to override some of the
flags passed to it though.

I also added the -devel packages, but I don't think this is a very good idea.
The packaging guidelines says its bad because it'll somehow pull in devel
packages in a non-devel install, but that is simply not true (it has no
dependencies). Instead we duplicate all the package metadata for a 900 byte
package, bloating the install. Furthemore, having a -devel package means the
distro compose will pull in the 32bit version of the packages into the 64bit
distro, reinstating the yum update multilib conflict we solved this week.

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to