Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel <lkund...@v3.sk> 2009-01-06 05:22:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > * You're not packing latest version of nightview (0.3.2) > > ftp://integral.physics.muni.cz/pub/nightview/ Updated. > * Some of files are GPLv2+ > > example: ./xnightview/base64.cpp The whole work is distributed as GPLv2. > If not it looks working fine - too bad we don't have a CCD camera to try it > out > :) A bigger pity is lack of open SBIG specification I'd say... SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~lkundrak/nightview-0.3.2-1.el5.i386/nightview-0.3.2-1.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://fedorapeople.org/~lkundrak/nightview-0.3.2-1.el5.i386/nightview.spec Build log: http://fedorapeople.org/~lkundrak/nightview-0.3.2-1.el5.i386/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review