Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478942 manuel wolfshant <wo...@nobugconsulting.ro> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |wo...@nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wo...@nobugconsulting.ro> 2009-01-06 16:16:22 EDT --- Once again, pretty much standard. Most noticeable: rpmlint of perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class.src: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint of perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class: perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082-1.fc11.noarch.rpm => Both can be ignored but keep in mind that the package will not be able to be included in a standard CD. Source rpm name has 68 chars, binary has 71 chars and both exceed the limit of 64 specified for Joliet sha1sum: ea63d54c6c5a5a1224d2913a795c68b537ea3733 Catalyst-Authentication-Store-DBIx-Class-0.1082.tar.gz make test is OK. License: - same as perl for User.pm and Class.pm - not specified for SimpleDB.pm Could you please try to clarify with the author the situation of SimpleDB.pm ? Most probably it has the same license as the rest of the code (and as specified in the README) but a written proof would be better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
