Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479515


Fabian Affolter <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]




--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <[email protected]>  2009-01-10 
12:47:56 EDT ---
Just some comment on your spec file

- The name of the spec file don't match guidelines
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name
- The summary needs to be improved.  It's not necessary to repeat the package
name.
- The license is wrong, check source header -> GPLv2+
- Your description looks very ugly. 
- Please preserve the time stamps in the install section if it's possible
  make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" install
- There are translations...
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
- AUTHORS, COPYING, and so on must be include as %doc.
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#.25files_prefixes
- You must install /verify the .desktop file
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files
- You must use macros in the %files section
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros
- Stuff from the doc directory in the source should marked as %doc in the
package.
- You should add a proper changelog entry.
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs

>From my point of view this package should be named as 'musicorganizer'. The Mac
version is called 'MusicOrganizer', the Debian version 'musicorganizer', and
the Windows package 'Music.Organizer'.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to