Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #11 from Mat Booth <[email protected]> 2009-01-11 19:10:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Re: comment #9 (spec URL) > > Your spec file has: > > Name: eclipse-emf > > but then later > > %package sdo-sdk > > Should the %packages also have the "eclipse-" prefix so that they can be > easily > found with `yum search eclipse`? (Forgive this newb question.) > They are given the "eclipse-" prefix by default. :-) (To specify otherwise, you have to use %package with the -n flag.) > BTW, SDO is deprecated in the current release of EMF 2.5 (under development, > due June 2009), so for Fedora 12, you might want to build a package for the > Apache Tuscany SDO project as a replacement. > > http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/SDO_Java_Overview I don't really use SDO (and I'm not aware of anything in Fedora that does). Is that a straight drop-in replacement? I was just planning on Obsoleting it when Andrew packages Eclipse 3.5 and just letting it die. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
