Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.mich...@gmx.net> 2009-01-13 15:15:11 EDT --- * "Summary" of -devel package is not "short and concise" as recommended by the guidelines, but two sentences squeezed into an overlong line. * Run rpmlint also on your src.rpm * src.rpm download URL gives 404 Not Found * %description of the -devel package is the same as the description of the main package. That can't be right. Typically, you can cut down on that and simply say something like: "This package contains development files for compiling software that uses %{name}." * -devel pkg typically must "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" to stay in sync with the main package. Note : That could also be the answer to your problem with the .so symlink. The symlink must be in the -devel package, and the -devel package requires the main package which contains the library file. * %files devel section is missing %defattr parameter * %files devel section contains unowned directories! Either add the missing %dir %{_docdir}/stxxl-1.2.1 %dir %{_includedir}/stxxl or use equivalent entries to include these directories and their contents recursively. You would do this by removing the "*" wildcard that you use currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
