Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388





--- Comment #3 from Tim Lauridsen <tim.laurid...@googlemail.com>  2009-01-16 
04:03:01 EDT ---

$ rpmlint Download/mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-2.fc10.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-2.fc10.noarch.rpm 
mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/term.h
mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/term.h
mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpdcurses.dll.a
mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpdcurses.dll.a
mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/curses.h
mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/curses.h
mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/panel.h
mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/panel.h
mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libpdcurses.dll.a
mingw32-pdcurses.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings.

This should be OK, because of the cross compiler nature of the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to