Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Richard W.M. Jones <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
         Depends on|                            |478640

--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <>  2009-01-16 06:37:19 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> if the patch issue is handled, then i will remove the package.

Heh, hope you meant "approve" :-)

In hindsight, this package was a bit of a mess, so I have
made lots of improvements in the new version, including
using all the patches.

Spec URL:

* Fri Jan 16 2009 Richard W.M. Jones <> - 2.3.8-1
- New upstream version 2.3.8.
- Use the patches from the Fedora native package.
- Disable patented code.
- Don't build the static library.
- Use _smp_mflags.
- BR mingw32-dlfcn (not required, but uses it if installed).
- Add license file to doc section.

$ rpmlint mingw32-freetype-2.3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm
mingw32-freetype-2.3.8-1.fc11.noarch.rpm |
  grep -v devel-file-in-non-devel-package
mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
mingw32-freetype.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
mingw32-freetype.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
mingw32-freetype.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32

These can all be ignored.  (Note that the MinGW packaging
guidelines allow the *.la file).

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to