Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 Jochen Schmitt <joc...@herr-schmitt.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |joc...@herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |joc...@herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt <joc...@herr-schmitt.de> 2009-01-19 14:54:51 EDT --- God: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with package name + Name of the package fits naming guidelines + Package contains most recent release + Package contains valid License tag + License tag contains GPLv2+ as a valid OSS license + License review on source files state, that GPLv2 may be + Package contains a verbatin copy of the license text + Package has no subpackages + Local buidl works fine + Package contains %clean stanza + Buildroot will be deleted on the beginning of %clean and %install + Local install works fine + Local uninstall works fine + Start of dnssec-conf without argument works witoht crash + Build on koji works fine + Rpmlint has no complaints about the source package + Rpmlint has no complaints about the binary package + Files has proper file permissions + All packaged files belong to the package + Package contains no files belong to other packages + %doc subpackage has a small amont, so we need no separate doc subpackage + Package contains proper %changelog Bad. - source tag not fully quallified - Package use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} - License review on source files state, that GPLv2 may be right value for the license tag TODO: - Please notify upstream, that eatch source file should have a proper copyright notice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
