Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #19 from Michal Hlavinka <mhlav...@redhat.com> 2009-01-20 10:44:23 EDT --- first round done rmplint squirrelmail.spec is quiet rmplint squirrelmail-*-src.rpm is quiet lot of not used/not useful/obsolete patches removed, some of them are not removed from cvs repository *for now* rpmlint noarch/squirrelmail-*-noarch.rpm is little less verbose (just a little) > htaccess-file moved to squirrelmail.conf > W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail-1.4.17/ReleaseNotes/1.4/Notes-1.4.12.txt > W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail-1.4.17/ReleaseNotes/1.4/Notes-1.4.13.txt fixed with sed in spec > E: zero-length > /usr/share/squirrelmail/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/serversidefilter.po.new removed in spec > W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/squirrelmail/plugins/filters/bulkquery/bulkquery.c > E: non-executable-script /usr/share/squirrelmail/plugins/demo/getpot 0644 I still haven't decided what to do with these two... (not only demo/getpot but demo/*) 1) move to /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail 2) remove completely 3) move to subpackage ---------- Tomas, if you could explain me (irc?) something about the utf-8 vs. CJK mess, it would be really appreciated. I've got this package with some fixes for CJK and that confuses me... I thought utf-8 should be able to handle it, so I'm little bit confused about all CJK workarounds/patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review