Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #28 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <r...@greysector.net> 2009-01-20 16:31:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > [...] > > strip --strip-unneeded $SOFILE > > > > Calling strip from the specfile is not allowed. rpm post-build scripts do > > that > > while building the debuginfo package. > > Although in this case they seem to fail. If I remove that strip call, I get: > $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result > flexdock-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package > flexdock.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > /usr/lib/flexdock/libRubberBand-0.so Actually it's simple. Just don't chmod the .so to 644. It has to be executable for rpmbuild debuginfo scripts to find it. rpmlint is silent afterwards. Some more nitpicks: You don't need mkdir -p %{buildroot}/usr/share There's still trailing whitespace in the following lines: Name: flexdock # This patch is fedora specific -- System.loadLibrary fix to help locate JNI components #Licence is MIT on their website, Apache in their LICENSE.txt patch3: flexdock-skinlfTitlebarui-path.patch patch4: flexdock-skinlfPainter-path.patch BuildRequires: java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel Requires: libX11 >= 1.1.4 JDK_DIR=`echo %{_jdkdir} | sed 's!/$!!'`.`uname -m` echo "Relying on spec file buildpath: $JDK_DIR " >> tmpLog echo "sdk.home=$JDK_DIR" > workingcopy.properties # https://skinlf.dev.java.net/ ant -Dbuild.sysclasspath=first build.with.native jar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
