Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035





--- Comment #25 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwiz...@gmail.com>  2009-01-22 
08:20:57 EDT ---
Sorry for the late answear, I've hit #475283 which prevented me to have a
system ready for packaging.


I've implemented the comments from Dan in #23, few notes:
- The main package should be multilibs compliant so I've splitted the bin and
python (which are mono-arches) and have them required by the main.
- NetworkManager plugin is merged back in the main package since dbus-libs
which it depends on is not much.
- Enabled all plugins by default at build time
- Add virtual Requires on %{name}-pac (EV) which are provided (EVR) by mozjs
and webkit. We only requires on Epoch:Version to let open for another package
to provides that capability

Spec URL:
http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libproxy.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libproxy-0.2.3-8.fc10.src.rpm


I plan to import libproxy to F10 and devel soon; unless that still needs
improvements...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to