Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of 
genomic sequences

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508

           Summary: Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple
                    alignments of genomic sequences
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net
         QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
                CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pipviewer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pipviewer-0.3.9-1.fc10.src.rpm

Project URL: http://ygingras.net/bioinfo

Description:
Pipviewer is a visualizer for multiple alignements of genomic
sequences.  It highlights conserved regions and allows basic
anotations.  Its main goal is to find conserved probes for the
construction of gene order data sets.  Selected regions marked as
'probes' can be expoxted to fasta format.  It can also retreive gene
annotations form the NBCI and display this information along the
alignement.

Pipviewer is not an aligner.  You must compute the alignment with
another tool like Clustal or Multi PIP Maker.

Koji scratch build:
depends on vhybridize

rpmlint output:
[...@laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint pipviewer-0.3.9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[...@laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pipviewer-0.3.9-1.fc10.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to