Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944


Miroslav Suchy <msu...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchy <msu...@redhat.com>  2009-02-04 10:56:22 EDT 
---
You forgot to set flag "fedora‑review?" setting it for you.

OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
SEE LATER - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
b72c0aa8950a6dfc1908b884fc768577 for both
N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch
FAIL - BuildRequires correct
N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang
N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK- Doc subpackage needed/used.
N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage.
N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
N/A - .la files are removed.
N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
FAIL - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
FAIL - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:
(include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =;
rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done
perl-Test-Harness-Straps-0.30-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
perl(Test::Harness::Assert) = 0.02
perl(Test::Harness::Iterator) = 0.02
perl(Test::Harness::Iterator::ARRAY)
perl(Test::Harness::Iterator::FH)
perl(Test::Harness::Point) = 0.01
perl(Test::Harness::Results) = 0.01
perl(Test::Harness::Straps) = 0.30
perl-Test-Harness-Straps = 0.30-1.fc11
=
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(Config)
perl(Exporter)
perl(Test::Harness::Assert)
perl(Test::Harness::Iterator)
perl(Test::Harness::Point)
perl(Test::Harness::Results)
perl(strict)
perl(vars)

SHOULD Items:

OK, tested on x86_64 - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
Didn't test - Should function as described.
No scriptlets - Should have sane scriptlets.
N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)

TODO:
please add build requires: perl(Test::More) 
it is no more part of perl itself in Fedora 11 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1103852
and try to build is as --scratch in koji

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to