Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aqsis - 3D Rendering system

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-08-20 14:44 EST -------
As the review bug says, this package is intended for rawhide/devel only.

The licensing is interesting.  The spec notes "GPL and LGPL" -- but it's not
package wide (that is, there's a bundled library that's LGPL, whereas the main
program itself is GPL).  Is it worth splitting the library out into its own
package, even if just a subpackage of this one, in order to clarify this at
the package level?  I suppose a relevent question here is: do we expect this
library to be used by other packages?  I'm inclined to defer to the judgement
of the packager.

Unfortunately, my mock build (devel/x86_64) fails:

/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc  -O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic   -o -rpath /usr/lib64/aqsis  gif2tif.lo ../common/
gcc -shared  .libs/gif2tif.o -Wl,--whole-archive ../common/.libs/libcommon.a
-Wl,--no-whole-archive  -L/usr/local/lib -ltiff  -m64 -mtune=generic
-Wl,-soname -Wl, -o .libs/
/usr/bin/ld: ../common/.libs/libcommon.a(pixelsave.o): relocation R_X86_64_32
against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object;
recompile with -fPIC
../common/.libs/libcommon.a(pixelsave.o): could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/aqsis-1.0.1/plugins/gif2tif'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/aqsis-1.0.1/plugins'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.16921 (%build)

This prevents me from completing the formal review...  I can post the
build.log, etc, here if it'll help.

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to