Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-08-20 21:48 EST -------
(In reply to comment #33)
> Once again it is not a gnash bug, but certainly an xorg/mesa bug
> triggered by gnash.

Nod, but until that is fixed it doesn't make sense really to include gnash in
Extras.  I suggest a bug be opened for that issue and that it block this bug. 

(In reply to comment #34)
> The patch works for me. It fills /tmp with temporary dirs, but
> it is better than what was before. It should be documented, however.
> So I propose to add a 
> README.fedora in the gnash-plugin documentation. I attach a spec 
> diff and a gnash-README.fedora.

Ok.

> I also think that it would be better to prefix plugin-tempfile-dir.patch
> with gnash, such that it is called gnash-plugin-tempfile-dir.patch 
> instead.

Why? :)

(In reply to comment #37)
> Another remark, autoconf is required by automake.

So you mean it shouldn't be in BR?  It can be removed I suppose
though it makes the dependency on autoreconf less obvious...
Perhaps autoconf should require automake too?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to