Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnash - GNU Flash player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192049 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-20 21:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > Once again it is not a gnash bug, but certainly an xorg/mesa bug > triggered by gnash. Nod, but until that is fixed it doesn't make sense really to include gnash in Extras. I suggest a bug be opened for that issue and that it block this bug. (In reply to comment #34) > The patch works for me. It fills /tmp with temporary dirs, but > it is better than what was before. It should be documented, however. > So I propose to add a > README.fedora in the gnash-plugin documentation. I attach a spec > diff and a gnash-README.fedora. Ok. > I also think that it would be better to prefix plugin-tempfile-dir.patch > with gnash, such that it is called gnash-plugin-tempfile-dir.patch > instead. Why? :) (In reply to comment #37) > Another remark, autoconf is required by automake. So you mean it shouldn't be in BR? It can be removed I suppose though it makes the dependency on autoreconf less obvious... Perhaps autoconf should require automake too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review