Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ggz-base-libs - Base libraries for GGZ gaming zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484363 Summary: Review Request: ggz-base-libs - Base libraries for GGZ gaming zone Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, email@example.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/ggz-base-libs/ggz-base-libs.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/ggz-base-libs/ggz-base-libs-0.99.5-1.src.rpm Description: GGZ (which is a recursive acronym for GGZ Gaming Zone) develops libraries, games and game-related applications for client-server online gaming. Player rankings, game spectators, AI players and a chat bot are part of this effort. A new review required since upstream merged previous libggz, ggz-client-libs into a new ggz-base-libs module. * Fri Feb 06 2009 Rex Dieter <rdie...@fedoraproject.org> 0.99.5-1 - ggz-base-libs-snapshot-0.99.5 - Obsoletes/Provides: libggz,ggz-client-libs Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1109295 for dist-f10, dist-f11+ looks like it needs some additional libtool(2) love, yay. rpmlint output: (using my f8 rpmlint) ggz-base-libs.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/ggz-config ggz-base-libs.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/menus/ggz.menu ggz-base-libs.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/menus/applications-merged/ggz.merge.menu ggz-base-libs-devel.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rpm/macros.ggz 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. These all are harmless here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review