Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-08-21 07:28 EST -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > I think moving the files but leaving the perl(...) Provides in is worse than
> > leaving the files in the usual locations (and leaving the Provides intact). 
> > Moving should be coupled with Provides (and probably Requires due to 
> > comment 8)
> > filtering but that's of questionable gain anyway, I'd revert moving the 
> > files
> > and doing things as usual.
> 
> My main concerns with leaving the files in %{perl_vendorarch} is that these 
> are
> application-specific perl modules.  They have no use outside of this package. 
>  I
> strongly prefer moving things like this into application specific directories
> such as %{_libdir}/%{name} instead of polluting the language library tree.

And I'm strongly in agreement with Wart. Whilst it's a little hassle in the spec
file, it's cleaner on the system the package gets installed into and is less
likely to result in future namespace collisions.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to