Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-02-08 11:45:46 EDT --- Ah, after reading http://musicxml.org/xml.html and also this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357461 and also your explanation: - This MusicXML document format license is free, GPL imcompatible - However it seems that kguitar behaves just an interpreter or editor for MusicXML document format license files. So there should no license issue for this package. Then: * _texmf macro - Isn't the following enough? ------------------------------------------------------------- %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN')} ------------------------------------------------------------- ! Versioning - For svn based tarball, I prefer to include revision number rather than the date I pulled the source because revision number specifies the source used precisely, however this is left to your choice. - By the way, would you tell me if this is after or before 0.5.1 formal release? * TeX dependency - I think 30 Mbyte extra dependency is enough large. Also I think that requiring another font for this package should not be mandatory. TeX related dependency should be split out. I would choose "kguitar-tex" for TeX related subpackage. * Timestamps ------------------------------------------------------------- touch -r %{name}/x-%{name}.desktop tmpfile ------------------------------------------------------------- - Is it really needed here to keep timestamps on this file? You "actually" modified this desktop file here. ? Desktop file location - Is it needed that the desktop file is installed under %_datadir/applications/kde, not under %_datadir/applications? Such desktop files cannot be seem from GNOME, however it seems that this application can be used also on GNOME. * _docdir - Files/directories under %_docdir are automatically marked as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
