Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225744 --- Comment #5 from Zdenek Prikryl <[email protected]> 2009-02-10 04:29:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > There is something in the guidelines about %makeinstall: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used > Since "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}" doesn't work and fbset doesn't use libtool or autotools stuff, I'd not remove the %makeinstall macro. > And I have seen this: > > MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an > architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in > ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in > bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work > on > that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the > corresponding ExcludeArch line. > I created the bug and write ID to the spec file. Check cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
