Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 --- Comment #3 from Milos Jakubicek <[email protected]> 2009-02-13 18:10:11 EDT --- Yep, I'm quoting the answer to my email: " Hey, Milos, I fixed compilation with recent Audacious versions in 3.1.0-rc7. [http://www.luminal.org/files/imms/imms-3.1.0-rc7.tar.bz2] I am fairly sure all the code in question is GPL. I made sure of that before including it. I do not have the time to follow up with the authors of the code right now, but I'm certainly willing to apply any patches to clarify licenses. Perhaps, Artur, the Debian IMMS maintainer (cc'ed) can help you there. He already did some work on getting explicit releases from the authors. Have fun, Michael. " It seems that all the thins are GPL indeed...looking into debian(lenny) imms packages, I found following: " +Author: Michael Grigoriev <[email protected]> + +Copyright (C) 2003-2005 Michael Grigoriev + +With the following exceptions: + + md5.{h,c} (added ability to restrict maximum size to process) + from GNU textutils + levenshtein.{h,c} (stripped down) + python-Levenshtein library + by David Necas (Yeti) <[email protected]> + regexx.{h,cc} (stripped down) + Regexx - Regular Expressions C++ solution + by Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> + xidle.{h,cc} + Borrows from xautolock 2.1 + by Michel Eyckmans (MCE) <[email protected]> + normal.h + by by Agner Fog " I'll prepare patches and request adding a LICENSE file into the source tarball and license information to all the source files (and merging the gcc43 patch of course too). I'd also include the above information as %doc. Would it be ok then? Regarding the review: the audacious plugin is working now, updated link are here: New SPEC: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms.spec New SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms-3.1.0-0.3.rc7.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1125850 As there are now both xmms and audacious plugins available, I'm considering splitting the package into a main one and two subpackages (-xmms, -audacious), I'm just not sure whether this wouldn't hit the usability from the user point of view too much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
