Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchy <[email protected]> 2009-02-18 07:09:52 EDT --- >Nice to have: ping upstream to include the license in the module themselves. I pinged myself and put it there. :) Updated: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object.spec http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object-1.26.10-1.src.rpm >And maybe change it to GPLv2+... Not possible. Sorry. >Is it realy normal to overlap the provides and the requires? Yes it is normal. Look on some other modules which has more then 2 modules and which require each other (e.g. perl-HTML-Parser). Nevertheless I did not put the requires and provides there. It is automatically generated by rpm. So if it is wrong (which I believe is not), then it is bug of rpmbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
