Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #30 from Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]> 2009-02-18 09:58:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > I am not sure about the need of an extras sub-package. I would expect that > most > of the users of this package will have the full set installed. In any case I > suggest to move all the dependencies to the main package and only do something > about it if there are complains later that this is a problem. I don't agree; the package should not be bloated. You don't need all of the packages to use SciTools. Also one must remember that there are still people using dialup connections, for whom downloading lots and lots of extra stuff is a problem. However, you might want to add a note about the extras metapackage to the %description, e.g. "For full functionality you may want to install the scitools-extras package." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
