Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727





--- Comment #9 from Lucian Langa <co...@gnome.eu.org>  2009-02-23 15:17:14 EDT 
---
Please bump & post your spec and srpm for each modification you make. It is
easier to track.

(In reply to comment #7)
> As for upstream, they do not want to change how they do the sonames as they
> claim that Debian requires it the way they do it.
Shared libraries should have a proper versioned soname. I really doubt Debian
forbids that.
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html

You can make one but problems will appear in case upstream decides on a
different scheme later on.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#no-soname
Starting with .0 for major is the best way. I still think you should insist on
proper soname upstream.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to