Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487421 --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(पराग) <[email protected]> 2009-03-02 21:05:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I modelled my spec after libxml2, which split static out into it's own > package. > It really doesn't matter to me, so I'll just move it into the -devel package. > > Updated: > > Spec URL: http://jeckersb.fedorapeople.org/libyaml/libyaml.spec > SRPM URL: > http://jeckersb.fedorapeople.org/libyaml/libyaml-0.1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm > > Thanks for looking at this! I mean to say, static libraries generally are not allowed to be packaged. see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries I think this package is not following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries_2 guidelines. I guess you need virtual provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
