Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <[email protected]> 2009-03-06 12:05:30 EDT --- Well, it is a matter of choice between freedom and quality (fluid-soundfont) versus convenience in terms of package size (pclite-soundfont). I would personally vote for freedom and quality. Also, I believe that many people who are into music/audio production prefer quality. If it is up to me I would choose http://6mata.com:8014/review/fluid-soundfont.spec.with.gus Note that, you will need to download the SRPM in the original message and overwrite its SPEC file with this one to review the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
