Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts <[email protected]> 2009-03-12 21:38:40 EDT --- Indeed, rpmlint produces those complaints; the only one that does concern me is the only-non-binary-in-usr-lib one. There are a couple of questions: What are the files in the -devel package used for? If you need them to compile things with tinycc, I don't see the point in having a separate -devel package at all. I tried running one of the example files without the -devel package installed and it failed due to a missing tcclib.h file, so it seems like you really do need the -devel package installed just to make use of the base package. Are those files really arch-specific? If they are (which is quite possible), then they're fine there. If they aren't, then /usr/share is a better place. Although I guess the point is academic since this only works on i386 anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
