Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490152 Stepan Kasal <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Stepan Kasal <[email protected]> 2009-03-13 11:48:12 EDT --- The above links are broken, the following use either: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/links.spec and http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/links-2.2-1.fc11.i386.rpm or: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/?path=fedora/ A quick note: your description here seems to be much better than the one in the spec file, for severalk reasons: The %description in spec file contains details about portability, which is not relevant for Fedora users; they are using the built binary, on Linux, with X11 for graphics, etc. These details belong to the README file copied to %doc (where they probably already are). OTOH, the %description does not mention Javascipt support. And a two line description is always better than 16 line one. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
