Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer <[email protected]> 2009-03-13 19:49:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > OK, that's fine, so long as you are aware of that and ensure that upgrade > paths > are always maintained. (Also please make a note of this situation in the spec > file near the version number so that other provenpackager maintainers who may > need to fix the package from time to time). It's a fairly common scheme for non-numeric versions and is specified specifically in the naming guidelines; I don't think this is needed. I'll try to get around to the other things soon, but I have finals in the next couple days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
