Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490580 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer <[email protected]> 2009-03-20 18:37:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=336130) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336130) [Review] Attached is my initial review. Summary: - rpmlint: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib should be explained or fixed - should tools/%{name}2pd-* be %doc? - is the doc subpackage not requiring the base package intentional? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
